'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Moderators: thunder, Gillian, Chari910, fruitbat, catloveyes, Helen8, kjshd05, Marie, LadyLucius

fruitbat
Posts: 2068
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 12:50 am
Location: Just hangin' around.

'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by fruitbat » Wed Dec 08, 2010 6:38 pm

Just keeping people informed. No Jason.
click
Several members of the cast, including Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint, recently confirmed that they had to film epilogue scenes again. The King's Cross station scenes were shot on location earlier this year, but will be re-shot at the Leavesden set this month.

Angel Tavington
Posts: 4968
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 9:01 pm
Location: Col. Tavington's tent
Contact:

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by Angel Tavington » Wed Dec 08, 2010 8:30 pm

Hmm...Emma will need a wig :D


~me
Last edited by Angel Tavington on Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

marilaine
Posts: 2839
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:54 pm
Location: Desperately searching for Michael

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by marilaine » Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:20 pm

Whoa! They'll need to re-shoot Epilogue? And, Emma has short hair. How are they going to find a wig to match Hermione's hair?
~ML *idofferminebutit'stooshort* :orangface

User avatar
Marie
I dig animals--sometimes hundreds of feet down
Posts: 6055
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 11:37 am
Location: Indialantic, FL

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by Marie » Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:40 pm

It's the Epilogue - and Hermione is her own woman!!!! She can have any lenght hair she wants! (But I suspect they will use a wig!) However she will be shown as quite a bit older - so it's not like they will need to match anything exactly. It's a short scene in the book and it sounds like they are completely re-doing it. So I don't think they will have a lot of difficulty.

User avatar
Helen8
Pillar of the Community
Posts: 9280
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 11:18 am
Location: SoCal

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by Helen8 » Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:03 pm

I really hope they don't go overboard with the aging makeup. :furthermore After all, it's only about 20 years later, making them approx. 37.
At 37, I looked more mature than I did at 17, but I didn't have sagging wrinkles and a hump. I had some crow's feet for myopic squinting, but that was it.
We'll see in July.

User avatar
Heather
Posts: 398
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:51 pm
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
Contact:

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by Heather » Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:37 pm

I have seen some of the epilogue photos of Daniel, Emma, Rupert and Tom in the paper [think it was The Mirror] they look OK I thought.

http://screenrant.com/harry-potter-deat ... ndy-62885/

HERE. Maybe this is why they have decided on the reshoot

Angel Tavington
Posts: 4968
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 9:01 pm
Location: Col. Tavington's tent
Contact:

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by Angel Tavington » Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:06 pm

Don't know...Draco looks much older than 37 (in the pic).


~me

User avatar
Helen8
Pillar of the Community
Posts: 9280
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 11:18 am
Location: SoCal

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by Helen8 » Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:39 pm

Draco looks like he's in his 70s, and Harry and Ron look like they're in their 50s. That's just way too much age makeup.

Do the people on this board in their mid-30s think they look like them? I should think not.

User avatar
a.p.k.
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by a.p.k. » Fri Dec 10, 2010 12:18 am

Helen8 wrote:Draco looks like he's in his 70s, and Harry and Ron look like they're in their 50s. That's just way too much age makeup.

Do the people on this board in their mid-30s think they look them? I should think not.


Do you really think that? I didn't think so. I thought they looked reasonably early-middle-aged.

User avatar
thunder
With her wheelbarrow full of surprises!
Posts: 5305
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:08 pm
Location: Norway

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by thunder » Fri Dec 10, 2010 12:33 am

The boys look way too old. No late 30's that I know (and I know plenty) look even close to this. My parents, in their middle 50's, look younger.That make up is a fail, I think it's strange they didn't notice that when they shot it. The girls' make up look a bit better...

Angel Tavington
Posts: 4968
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 9:01 pm
Location: Col. Tavington's tent
Contact:

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by Angel Tavington » Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:12 am

Helen8 wrote:Draco looks like he's in his 70s, and Harry and Ron look like they're in their 50s. That's just way too much age makeup.
I agree. I guess this is why they had been called back to reshoot the epilogue.



~me

User avatar
Lisabella
Posts: 303
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 12:06 pm
Location: next door to alice
Contact:

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by Lisabella » Fri Dec 10, 2010 8:10 am

You're right. They look far too old. Especially Draco... Nobody looks that old in their late 30s, except for Lindsay Lohan. She will :D

grannybear
Posts: 2582
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 3:36 pm
Location: Florida

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by grannybear » Fri Dec 10, 2010 10:13 am

Who knows. Maybe Draco looks that old because of what his father, Lucius, has put him through.

User avatar
Helen8
Pillar of the Community
Posts: 9280
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 11:18 am
Location: SoCal

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by Helen8 » Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:16 pm

My parents, in their middle 50's, look younger.

Thank you, thunder, for proving my point.
H'wood has been contributing to all the plastic surgery craze with shite like this. No one looks this old at 37. I hope that Angel's comment about the reshoot was correct, that they got the age look waaaaay wrong.

:soap
*steps down from soapbox*

Angel Tavington
Posts: 4968
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 9:01 pm
Location: Col. Tavington's tent
Contact:

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by Angel Tavington » Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:12 pm

Nobody looks that old in their late 30s, except for Lindsay Lohan. She will
Well, alcohol and drugs can cause premature aging.


~me

Post Reply