'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Moderators: thunder, Gillian, Chari910, fruitbat, catloveyes, Helen8, kjshd05, Marie, LadyLucius

User avatar
a.p.k.
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by a.p.k. » Sat Dec 11, 2010 3:57 pm

Huh. I guess we all have different eyes, then.

I'm pushing 50, and my husband is pushing 60, and I didn't think any of them looked our age or even close. They all looked younger to me. And Draco, too ... I didn't think he looked particularly old at all. I was thinking he looked like he was maybe 30, that they should've aged him more. LOL

Like I said, different eyes.

User avatar
thunder
With her wheelbarrow full of surprises!
Posts: 5270
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:08 pm
Location: Norway

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by thunder » Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:08 am

I guess we just have to agree to disagree. :D

Angel Tavington
Posts: 4968
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 9:01 pm
Location: Col. Tavington's tent
Contact:

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by Angel Tavington » Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:40 pm

Yep LOL
Agreeing to disagree is a sign of maturity :)



~me

User avatar
Heather
Posts: 398
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:51 pm
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
Contact:

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by Heather » Sun Dec 12, 2010 6:11 pm

I do think that Emma, Dan and Rupert look OK but they have gone way overboard with Tom and I think this is probably the reason for the reshoot, I guess it will be very interesting to see the changed result [if that is the reason] we should start taking bets!!!

User avatar
Bellatrixie
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by Bellatrixie » Fri Jan 21, 2011 9:03 am

Ginny, Harry and Hermione look okay, but Draco and Ron look a bit too old and Ron's forehead looks odd.
I read that Tom doesn´t have to return for filming, so Draco might look like that in the movie. :-|

User avatar
Helen8
Pillar of the Community
Posts: 9247
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 11:18 am
Location: SoCal

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by Helen8 » Fri Jan 21, 2011 12:06 pm

Yeah. Unfortunately for the bad make-up, the refilming has to do with where Snape dies. In the book and in the first shoot, he dies in the Shrieking Shack. In the reshoot, he dies in the boathouse, the place where the student Snape spent time with student Lily.

http://www.just2pale.com/Viewer.aspx?n=SnapeDies

User avatar
Marie
I dig animals--sometimes hundreds of feet down
Posts: 6040
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 11:37 am
Location: Indialantic, FL

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by Marie » Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:37 pm

Interesting - I was disapointed in the book with how he died. I hope they do more justice to Snape in the re-shoot.

Angel Tavington
Posts: 4968
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 9:01 pm
Location: Col. Tavington's tent
Contact:

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by Angel Tavington » Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:50 pm

Snape is one of my favorite characters. I didn't know that he dies...I'm sad now LOL


~me

User avatar
Helen8
Pillar of the Community
Posts: 9247
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 11:18 am
Location: SoCal

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by Helen8 » Fri Jan 21, 2011 7:13 pm

Angel, you really need to read the books. :???:

Angel Tavington
Posts: 4968
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 9:01 pm
Location: Col. Tavington's tent
Contact:

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by Angel Tavington » Fri Jan 21, 2011 7:31 pm

:oops: :oops: :oops:


~me

frenchinhaler
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 6:23 pm

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by frenchinhaler » Sun Jan 23, 2011 6:30 pm

Most likely. If it were the dialog, they would've looped it. I should think it was nothing to do with the set/dressing. I bet having to reshoot anything in the movies( apart from a Harry in the forest scene) would be very costly. I think everyone is aging fairly appropriately, I don't think Ron turned out as attractive as the casting directors might have hoped.

_____________________________
Jason looks great in my home theater seating.
Last edited by frenchinhaler on Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:09 am, edited 2 times in total.

marilaine
Posts: 2839
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:54 pm
Location: Desperately searching for Michael

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by marilaine » Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:40 am

Say what? This is like what they did to Narcissa's hair. It just doesn't work. Good grief, didn't they have JK there to have any opinions? :rave

~ML *howisNaginigonnafitinthattinyarea*

Angel Tavington
Posts: 4968
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 9:01 pm
Location: Col. Tavington's tent
Contact:

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by Angel Tavington » Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:22 pm

I'm sure there's a reason Narcissa's hair isn't blond LOL!


~me

SaraR
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 2:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO
Contact:

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by SaraR » Wed Jan 26, 2011 1:39 am

I haven't read all of the books either. I got to halfway through book 2 and kind of gave up. That was a long time ago though. I kind of like not knowing what is going to happen... I remember seeing something in a few places where Jason said he stopped reading the books because he would be really disappointed that parts of the book weren't being used, and I think that's pretty fair to be honest. I've seen movie adaptations from books that were so disappointing in the past that made me wonder why I made the effort.

At least this way, I have only a vague idea of what is going to happen, and I'm excited. :) I don't have to worry about saying OH mah gawd, why did they shoot this like this? Or Oooh man, that was totally not how I pictured it, and I'm kind of relieved.

I'm sure sometime in the future I'll read them, I'm just mega lazy right now and all the books are back at my parents' house.

User avatar
Sephirayne
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 5:15 am
Location: Manchester, England. UK
Contact:

Re: 'Harry Potter' reshoot 'proves costly'

Post by Sephirayne » Wed Jan 26, 2011 5:26 am

Angel Tavington wrote:I'm sure there's a reason Narcissa's hair isn't blond LOL!


~me
From what I understand they decided to go with the two tone look to show that she is both from the House of Black and Malfoy Family.

Personally I think it looks horrible.

Back On Topic. Yes, I read somewhere that the reshoots are something to do with Snape. I'll be interested to see how it will be done.

I do think that Tom looks bad in the ageing make-up. No way is he supposed to be about 37ish. I'm 36 and I haven't aged like that.

Post Reply