Interviews

Chari910 · Post by **Chari910** » Sun Jun 19, 2011 3:23 pm

Is he as buff as the Action Man dolls of him in leading acting roles that his disturbing fans have put up at jasonisaacsonline.com? Etc.

So..are we DISTURBING fans now??

kjshd05 · Post by **kjshd05** » Sun Jun 19, 2011 3:39 pm

I didn't like that either

thunder · Post by **thunder** » Sun Jun 19, 2011 3:50 pm

Just rise above it.

inamac · Post by **inamac** » Sun Jun 19, 2011 4:11 pm

Fun interview, though I do wonder which press release the "Kate's novels, which I listened to as audiobooks long before I got this part," error comes from - I've seen it several times now - doesn't say much for journalistic independent research!

kjshd05 · Post by **kjshd05** » Sun Jun 19, 2011 4:16 pm

As fans we know more than journalists

Bellatrixie · Post by **Bellatrixie** » Sun Jun 19, 2011 4:22 pm

Is he as buff as the Action Man dolls of him in leading acting roles that his disturbing fans have put up at jasonisaacsonline.com? Etc.

Haha, this guy must be really jealous, because he doesn't have and will never have any "disturbing" fans.

laurielove · Post by **laurielove** » Sun Jun 19, 2011 4:46 pm

Great Guardian interview. Thanks for posting, Thunder.

fruitbat · Post by **fruitbat** » Sun Jun 19, 2011 5:26 pm

A very interesting interview.

I'm curious about his turning down the role of Rochester; which version/when was it, do you think?

Ciaran Hinds played him in 1997. And according to imdb William Hurt`s version was in 1996. (I didn't realise those two productions were so close together.) Toby Stephens played him in 2006. I think the recent Michael Fassbender version is unlikely to have been it.

crawfoc99 · Post by **crawfoc99** » Sun Jun 19, 2011 5:42 pm

Excellent radio interviews and superb article in The Guardian.

Many thanks for posting them.

Hooroo,
Carole

grannybear · Post by **grannybear** » Sun Jun 19, 2011 5:45 pm

DISTURBING?

I thought we were a nice group of fans.
Everyone is polite and we never talk bad about other actors.
(maybe we bitch once in awhile but very seldom and it's for a good cause)

Post by **Hilary the Touched** » Sun Jun 19, 2011 7:24 pm

Sorry, I've just now got round to reading this--that particular reference was plainly to these:

I was also taken aback at the Rochester reference--first I've heard about that.

inamac · Post by **inamac** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 2:10 am

Have we had this one from the Irish 'Independent'?

http://www.independent.ie/lifestyle/is- ... 00406.html

The answer to the question, by the way, is "Yes".

belladisordine · Post by **belladisordine** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:31 am

I saw that yesterday, and it irked me a bit. Mainly because I think it would take a lot of talent to make a doll like that and I hate when people make assumptions. Then I realized, hey its free advertising for the site, more people will be checking it out if for nothing more than to see the dolls!

kjshd05 · Post by **kjshd05** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:01 am

nice inamac thanx

agree with you bella, was looking to see if one could comment under the article, and NO you can't

grannybear · Post by **grannybear** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:12 am

A Sex God .......... WOW !

JASON ISAACS -- THE LOST GIRLS

Interviews

Re: Interviews

Re: Interviews

Re: Interviews

Re: Interviews

Re: Interviews

Re: Interviews

Re: Interviews

Re: Interviews

Re: Interviews

Re: Interviews

Re: Interviews

Re: Interviews

Re: Interviews

Re: Interviews

Re: Interviews